Alderney eGambling's CEO addresses the risks unlicensed Asian bookmakers run when signing Premier League sponsorship deals.
In our latest editorial for Asia Gaming Lawyer, Alderney eGambling's CEO, Susan O'Leary, addresses the risks unlicensed Asian bookmakers run when signing Premier League sponsorship deals.
You can view the full issue of Asian Gaming Lawyer here, or continue reading for our contribution.
English Premier League football clubs undertook a GBP1 billion spending spree during this year’s summer transfer window, but online bookmakers were equally keen to get their cheque books out. Particularly those from Asia.
ManBetX and Letou inked major shirt sponsorship deals with Crystal Palace and Swansea City respectively. They join Watford, West Bromwich Albion and Bournemouth, who will also carry Asian bookmaker sponsorship during the season.
These deals are a boon for Asian betting operators; the Premier League had 2.7 billion global viewers last year, 38 percent of whom were from the region. So while they come with multi-million-pound price tags, analysts believe they are worth every penny.
For Asian bookmakers, the goal is to create brand awareness in their home markets, becoming the go-to betting brand in their respective territories. By joining forces with such large clubs, they are automatically seen to be more trustworthy and legitimate.
With so many games now televised and broadcast around the world, shirt sponsorship is perhaps the most direct way of getting a betting brand in front of potential customers – particularly when above the line advertising for online betting is banned in most Asian countries.
This is strengthened further by all the additional marketing activity football clubs undertake using their shirts, and the extra exposure that brings to betting operators. Think magazine shoots, social media activity and television adverts.
Cause for concern
There is cause for concern, however. When signing sponsorship deals with clubs, there is no legal requirement for betting operators to be licenced or regulated.
This throws up the potential for a Premier League football club to effectively endorse an online bookmaker that is highly exposed to fraud, money laundering, and cyber security attacks.
Bookmakers that do hold licences from internationally recognized regulators should stand a much stronger chance of securing deals with high profile teams, as these issues can be all but negated. It adds a layer of protection, a shield, if you like, for all stakeholders.
It must be remembered that Asia is still very much in its infancy when it comes to online betting regulation, and there are plenty of unlicensed bookmakers plying their trade in the region that are not operating to the same high standards as those in established European markets.
This has not gone unnoticed by the Football Association, which is taking a closer look at the relationship between football clubs and bookmakers. It even took the decision to terminate its own sponsorship agreement with Ladbrokes over “conflict of interest” concerns.
The FA has yet to clearly state its stance on football clubs and bookmakers joining forces, with a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the situation. However, it is not beyond the realms of possibility that these deals may be stamped out in the future.
If that does happen, it means Asian bookmakers will have to find another way of building trust and credibility among players in the markets where they operate. Licensing is certainly one way they can create that comfort factor.
To do that, Asian bookmakers need to seek approval from internationally recognized regulators such as the Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC). When it comes to licensing, they are one of the top for Premier League clubs.
By obtaining a permit from the AGCC, players can be sure that bookmakers are honest and transparent, that their odds and games are fair, and that they have the necessary player protection measures in place.
Operators should be doing this already, of course, and, as mentioned previously, I believe that it should be a requirement for bookmakers entering sponsorship deals with football clubs to be licensed in order for the agreement to be signed off in the first place.
It benefits the bookmaker, too. It is all well and good operators putting themselves under the spotlight via these high-profile partnerships, but if a punter arrives at their site and doesn’t receive the right experience, they will simply wager elsewhere.
That means all the exposure gained via these show-stopper deals will be for nothing. A licence from the AGCC, however, ensures that operators deliver a league-winning experience to the players that engage with their brand.
One of the major advantages of obtaining a permit is that it opens doors to work with other licensed suppliers; companies at the cutting edge of technology and customer service that can elevate an operator’s product offering to the next level.
This is certainly true when it comes to banks and payment processing, an area where Asian online betting operators continue to struggle. Most major financial institutions and payment gateways simply won’t work with an online betting operator if they do not hold a licence.
This not only causes headaches for the operator themselves – where do they bank, how do they move money around, withdraw profits, etc – but also for players, who want to deposit via debit and credit cards but are forced to use obscure payment methods instead.
Shout from the terraces
If Asian bookmakers are serious about building brand equity and awareness, then licensing should be a priority. Sponsorship deals with Premier League football clubs certainly raise their profile, but before shouting from the terraces they must ensure they are fully compliant with even the most basic industry standards.
What’s more, if the FA does decide to clamp down on these deals, then operators will have to find a new way of not only reaching out to players, but also proving they are honest, transparent, and that everything is above board.
Those who combine licensing with high profile marketing activity will certainly find themselves as title contenders come the end of the season, but those who forego compliance are at serious risk of being relegated.